Updating your anti-virus software may not be enough -- Read Here
malicious code in the operating system? I think someone is just trying to start a scare. Jpegs are just data -- they don't get executed. It's up to the browser to display what the data says, and it's unlikely it will spawn a virus unless the person who wrote the browser put the virus in the browser in the first place.dhooks said:Theres a flaw in microsofts jpeg rendering technology that allows malicious code to be inserted into a pic which after you dl allows it to contact a website. In short it allows someone remote access. I think XP, WS 2003 and some versions of Office are the main ones affected.
So you all may want to update your antivirus if its a little outdated or go dl Microsofts security patch.
So, wasn't I right in the first place? The malicious code is really in Microsoft's jpg rendering software?xjet said:No, there's a definite vulnerability there.
The JPEG format includes a header that contains some data used to reconstruct the image.
Microsoft's software doesn't properly check that the header fields contain valid information which can result in the JPEG decoder accidentally over-writing some critical bits of memory which can then allow an executable payload also included in the JPEG file to execute.
The first couple of exploits for this vulnerability are alread in circulation.