The Profile Brotherhood RC Forum banner

Mr. Billy Hell

1001 Views 14 Replies 9 Participants Last post by  xjet
I have already been asked to remove the avatar...

Does it need to go ?????

I think it is ok, because it shows NO "private" parts. If you say it has to go then it has to go....
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
what do you think ?
Texas 3D said:
what do you think ?
It is not up to me.....
I think it was the intent, not the definition of "porn", that Billy wanted to keep the site clean from "girly pics". While you may not show any pubic areas, a 4-way lesbian 69 avatar probably does not meet the intent of the no porn directive. It's more of a common sense/common courtesy call than a hair splitting over "what is porn".
Well that brings me to one question.....

Why after the RCU bullshit are things changing?

There may be some threads out there that explain it, but I was under the impression that Bros tear shit up and do not give a .....well?????
4-way lesbian 69 avatar
Wow, thats incredible! I only saw 3 the first time I saw it. :p
ChuckAuger said:
While you may not show any pubic areas, a 4-way lesbian 69 avatar probably does not meet the intent of the no porn directive. quote]

You Think?
I'm getting hungry.
RJohnson said:
Well that brings me to one question.....

Why after the RCU bullshit are things changing?

There may be some threads out there that explain it, but I was under the impression that Bros tear shit up and do not give a .....well?????
Well, mainly because we don't have an age disclaimer to enter the site. To enter a proper porn site, you have to claim that you are over 18. Seeing as how porn is not (for most of us) the primary reason we come to this site, the age discliamer is just more stuff we don't need. Why would we care?? Because Marc at RCU hinted that he would would bring heat on Billy for having a porn site without the age disclaimer, and he banned links to this site from RCU. SInce the porn pics are (for the most part) gone, links to this site are once again allowed.

Now, as a favor to Billy, most of us have seen our way clear to leave the questionable pictures off this site since Billy asked us to.
That is all the reason most of us need.

Some seem to want to press the issue, despite Billy asking them to not post this sort of pic.

As for tearing shit up, we tore up quite a bit of shit in Texarkana last weekend, and did it without any porn.
See less See more
Rob.....

Your avitar is way cool, but what Chuck says makes sense. Sorry, you need to take it down, but I do like it.

Later William
I understand why people might be sensitive to the idea that I might be kissing ass or changing what this site is about. The fact is that I didn't want to get sued. I don't really have the cash for that. That's why there are no nude girls on the site. Pretty simple. If that in any way changed what we are about I would have done something about it but it doesn't. Really what this site and the Bros are about is talking, teaching, learning about profiles and 3D. So while a fine sister does have a nice profile the lack of that profile on the site is not a big deal. Someone mentioned that you could find all the porn you want in two mouseclicks on the web so why do we need it here. That made sense to me.
Well spoken Billy.........

Chuck: Your experience with internet porn is awe inspiring. :lol:
I sent a PM to Billy and as you see......

I did not know some of the circumstances and before my lil 4 - 69 got anything started I removed it.

All the avatar was for is like any one else's .... recognition.....

NOW!!!!.....

I do think this was named "Mr. Billy Hell".....

not "Hey bros tell me where to go!!!".....

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I hope to meet you guys in Nashville.
See less See more
ChuckAuger said:
RJohnson said:
Well that brings me to one question.....

Why after the RCU bullshit are things changing?

There may be some threads out there that explain it, but I was under the impression that Bros tear shit up and do not give a .....well?????
Now, as a favor to Billy, most of us have seen our way clear to leave the questionable pictures off this site since Billy asked us to.
That is all the reason most of us need.

Some seem to want to press the issue, despite Billy asking them to not post this sort of pic.

As for tearing shit up, we tore up quite a bit of shit in Texarkana last weekend, and did it without any porn.
Is this implying me? I had no idea that it was asked for us to not do this. So therefore, I was not pressing an issue!
ChuckAuger said:
I think it was the intent, not the definition of "porn", that Billy wanted to keep the site clean from "girly pics". While you may not show any pubic areas, a 4-way lesbian 69 avatar probably does not meet the intent of the no porn directive. It's more of a common sense/common courtesy call than a hair splitting over "what is porn".
Yeah, with all the prissy do-gooders out there who believe we must be protected from ourselves, having any porn on a website runs the risk that it'll be pot on some puritanical ISP's block-list and then some of us would have even more trouble getting through to it.

As it is, the ISP that hosts the forum site refuses to update their bogon lists so I have to reconfigure my browser to use a proxy every time I visit because otherwise they believe that my IP number doesn't exist (sigh!).

Personally I don't have anything against porn ^H^H^H "adult erotica" -- hell the internet runs on porn these days but SBs proliferate even within the ranks of ISPs :-(
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top